This multi-state study assesses outcomes related to recidivism, employment, expenditures, mental well-being, and household spillovers. Researchers specifically analyzed how increasing the dollar amount of financial obligations imposed upon conviction across five states (Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin) affected individuals over a ten-year period. They found that financial sanctions placed low-income defendants at higher risk for debt collection, arrest warrants, and potential license suspensions. The authors suggest that financial sanctions neither improve public safety nor promote rehabilitation. Instead, fines and fees serve as a regressive funding mechanism for state and local governments and add to growing evidence that fines and fees disproportionately burden low-income individuals without delivering their intended policy benefits. Given the lack of measurable benefits and the documented harm, the study supports calls for courts to reevaluate how financial penalties are used.
You can read the full text here.
Key Findings:
- Low-income individuals were more likely to face debt collection, arrest warrants, and driver’s license suspensions due to unpaid fines, deepening their involvement in the justice system. They also experienced notable negative impacts on their earnings.
- Individuals with prior convictions and those with lower incomes experienced slightly increased conviction rates.
- Fines and fees had a greater negative impact on the W-2 earnings of females than males after ten years; females experienced a larger drop in earnings (-$75.47) than males (-$25.98).
- Financial sanctions had no significant impact on recidivism, as conviction rates remained unchanged regardless of fine amounts.
- Increased fines and fees did not lead to measurable changes in annual earnings, employment rates, household financial stability, or mental well-being for most individuals.
- Some states included in the study eventually discontinued these financial sanctions, recognizing their failure to generate meaningful revenue or achieve policy goals.
Recommendations by the Study’s Authors:
- Eliminate or reduce fines and fees for low-income defendants.
- End the use of debt-based punishments such as arrest warrants, license suspensions, and extended probation for nonpayment.
- Shift court funding away from fines and fees.