Mueller v. State
Appeal of trial court’s decision denying defendants’ participation in a trial diversion program. The two appellants were offered participation in a pretrial diversion program if they paid $230 in fees. Appellants were unable to pay, and the prosecution sought to remove them from the program. They filed a complaint alleging removal from the program because of their inability to pay the fees is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
Holding
Payment of a fee as an absolute condition of participation in the program discriminates against indigent appellants and violates the Fourteenth Amendment. There is no rational relationship between a defendant’s guilt or innocence and his inability to pay fees.
Recommended Articles
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families
People living paycheck-to-paycheck and communities of color are disproportionately impacted by criminal justice fines and fees. The consequences for b...
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families
Diversion Without Debt: Case Studies from Three County Prosecutors Leading Fee Reform
Diversion Without Debt: Case Studies from Three County Prosecutors Leading Fee Reform
State of Iowa v. Pagliai
State of Iowa v. Pagliai
Ellinburg v. United States
Ellinburg v. United States
People v. Kopp
People v. Kopp