Ohio House Bill 336: Create driver’s license reinstatement fee amnesty initiative
This Ohio bill established the Reinstatement Fee Amnesty Initiative, a six-month driver’s license reinstatement fee debt reduction and amnesty program. Eligibility for the debt reduction and amnesty depended on a few factors: completion of court-ordered sanctions besides payment, the amount of time elapsed since the court-ordered driver’s license suspension period ended, and whether the person in question is indigent. This legislation also specifies how much a person is required to pay if they are granted reinstatement fee debt reduction.
You can read the full text of the bill here.
Key Provisions
- For people who owe fees for multiple offenses, the amnesty program only requires them to pay either (1) their lowest reinstatement fee or (2) 10% of the total fees owed, whichever is greater. Individuals who owe a fee for just one offense covered by this act are only required to pay half of their outstanding debt.
- If an individual is unable to pay any of their outstanding debt, they must substantiate their claim with documentation approved by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles.
Primary sponsor(s): John Barnes, David Greenspan
Status: Enacted
Recommended Articles
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families
People living paycheck-to-paycheck and communities of color are disproportionately impacted by criminal justice fines and fees. The consequences for b...
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families
Diversion Without Debt: Case Studies from Three County Prosecutors Leading Fee Reform
Diversion Without Debt: Case Studies from Three County Prosecutors Leading Fee Reform
States Should Reduce or Eliminate Criminal Fines and Fees, Even Amid Challenging Fiscal
States Should Reduce or Eliminate Criminal Fines and Fees, Even Amid Challenging Fiscal
People v. Kopp
People v. Kopp
Alternative Funding for Trial Courts: Implementation Recommendations
Alternative Funding for Trial Courts: Implementation Recommendations