Debt Bondage: How Private Collection Agencies Keep the Formerly Incarcerated Tethered to the Criminal Justice System
In Washington, the clerk of courts can transfer the legal financial obligations of incarcerated people to a private debt collection agency if they are thirty days late making a payment. This article examines the statutes permitting this practice. The authors conclude that Washington State’s collection agency referral law, and similar laws in other states, may violate constitutional due process and excessive fine edicts.
Reform Proposals:
- Exempt LFOs from state law
- Cancel courts’ contracts with private debt collection agencies
- Curb unfair debt collection practices
- Require collection fees to bear some rational relationship to the costs of collection
- End transfers to debt collection agencies after only thirty days
- Disallow the accrual of interest
- Require an Ability to Pay analysis
- Make contracts between courts and debt collection agencies uniform
Read the full article here.
Recommended Articles
Local Court Fee Increases Associated with Increased Jail Detention
In Alabama, most counties have the authority to create fees, and over the past decade many have expanded court fees. Between 2012 and 2024, 39 local a...
Local Court Fee Increases Associated with Increased Jail Detention
Taxation by Citation: A 50-State Data and Policy Report on Local Government Fines and Forfeitures
Taxation by Citation: A 50-State Data and Policy Report on Local Government Fines and Forfeitures
Calls and Conduct: The Impact of Free Communication on Prison Misconduct
Calls and Conduct: The Impact of Free Communication on Prison Misconduct
The Economic Impacts on Mothers of Having an Incarcerated Co-Parent
The Economic Impacts on Mothers of Having an Incarcerated Co-Parent
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families