Debt Bondage: How Private Collection Agencies Keep the Formerly Incarcerated Tethered to the Criminal Justice System
In Washington, the clerk of courts can transfer the legal financial obligations of incarcerated people to a private debt collection agency if they are thirty days late making a payment. This article examines the statutes permitting this practice. The authors conclude that Washington State’s collection agency referral law, and similar laws in other states, may violate constitutional due process and excessive fine edicts.
Reform Proposals:
- Exempt LFOs from state law
- Cancel courts’ contracts with private debt collection agencies
- Curb unfair debt collection practices
- Require collection fees to bear some rational relationship to the costs of collection
- End transfers to debt collection agencies after only thirty days
- Disallow the accrual of interest
- Require an Ability to Pay analysis
- Make contracts between courts and debt collection agencies uniform
Read the full article here.
Recommended Articles
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families
People living paycheck-to-paycheck and communities of color are disproportionately impacted by criminal justice fines and fees. The consequences for b...
The Cost We No Longer Pay: How Fines and Fees Reform Delivered Billions in Relief for Families
Roots of Wealth: Unearthing Black Prosperity in the South
Roots of Wealth: Unearthing Black Prosperity in the South
Following the Money of Mass Incarceration 2026
Following the Money of Mass Incarceration 2026
Diversion Without Debt: Case Studies from Three County Prosecutors Leading Fee Reform
Diversion Without Debt: Case Studies from Three County Prosecutors Leading Fee Reform
State of Iowa v. Pagliai
State of Iowa v. Pagliai